11.30.2009

beating a dead horse...

so i check out for a four day weekend of food, family, fun, and hallucinogens, only to come back to the real world and see that media is still turning up the heat on Obama. now here the role of the genetic dissenter becomes a precarious perch; for if public opinion eventually turns against Obama, then I'm forced to support him by definition of my role. some might say that makes me a hypocrite, but that's not exactly the truth. I'm always against whatever most people are for. so lets practice. what if i had to defend Obama against his major criticisms?...

they say

"He thinks he’s playing with Monopoly money

Economists and business leaders from across the ideological spectrum were urging the new president on last winter when he signed onto more than a trillion in stimulus spending and bank and auto bailouts during his first weeks in office. Many, though far from all, of these same people now agree that these actions helped avert an even worse financial catastrophe.

Along the way, however, it is clear Obama underestimated the political consequences that flow from the perception that he is a profligate spender. He also misjudged the anger in middle America about bailouts with weak and sporadic public explanations of why he believed they were necessary."


i say:

"it is monopoly money. the u.s. dollar hasn't been worth cat shit since the greenback was killed and the federal reserve was created. don't believe me? go watch this movie:

http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

after that, you'll understand that all money is really debt. so by spending it, Obama is really creating less debt. yeah, that's the ticket. spend it before it goes bad..."

they say:

"He sees America as another pleasant country on the U.N. roll call, somewhere between Albania and Zimbabwe

That line belonged to George H.W. Bush, excoriating Democrat Michael Dukakis in 1988. But it highlights a continuing reality: In presidential politics the safe ground has always been to be an American exceptionalist.

Politicians of both parties have embraced the idea that this country — because of its power and/or the hand of Providence — should be a singular force in the world. It would be hugely unwelcome for Obama if the perception took root that he is comfortable with a relative decline in U.S. influence or position in the world.

On this score, the reviews of Obama’s recent Asia trip were harsh.

His peculiar bow to the emperor of Japan was symbolic. But his lots-of-velvet, not-much-iron approach to China had substantive implications.

On the left, the budding storyline is that Obama has retreated from human rights in the name of cynical realism. On the right, it is that he is more interested in being President of the World than President of the United States, a critique that will be heard more in December as he stops in Oslo to pick up his Nobel Prize and then in Copenhagen for an international summit on curbing greenhouse gases."


i say

"America is another pleasant country on the U.N. roll call, somewhere between Albania and Zimbabwe. didn't you people learn alphabetical order in grade school? wtf? oh I'm sorry, did i miss the shuttle to the time machine that took everyone else back to ww1? the whole concept of superpowers is so 1980 anyway. the world grows smaller by the minute, there isn't any room for national egos anymore. get over it. of course he wants to be president of the world. who wouldn't? sounds like a sweet fucking gig to me..."

they say:

"Too much Leonard Nimoy

People used to make fun of Bill Clinton’s misty-eyed, raspy-voiced claims that, “I feel your pain.”

The reality, however, is that Clinton’s dozen years as governor before becoming president really did leave him with a vivid sense of the concrete human dimensions of policy. He did not view programs as abstractions — he viewed them in terms of actual people he knew by name.

Obama, a legislator and law professor, is fluent in describing the nuances of problems. But his intellectuality has contributed to a growing critique that decisions are detached from rock-bottom principles.

Both Maureen Dowd in The New York Times and Joel Achenbach of The Washington Post have likened him to Star Trek’s Mr. Spock."

i say:

"i always thought Spock would have made a great captain. period. sure, kirk slept with green women and fought klingons, but only after asking Spock's advice first. think about that."


they say:

"President Pelosi

No figure in Barack Obama’s Washington, including Obama, has had more success in advancing his will than the speaker of the House, despite public approval ratings that hover in the range of Dick Cheney’s. With a mix of tough party discipline and shrewd vote-counting, she passed a version of the stimulus bill largely written by congressional Democrats, passed climate legislation, and passed her chamber’s version of health care reform. She and anti-war liberals in her caucus are clearly affecting the White House’s Afghanistan calculations.

The great hazard for Obama is if Republicans or journalists conclude — as some already have — that Pelosi’s achievements are more impressive than Obama’s or come at his expense."


i say:
"damn...they kind of have a point...."

No comments:

Post a Comment